The Night the Game Became a Weapon
On February 1, 2012, 74 people were killed at a football match in Port Said, Egypt. It was not hooliganism. It was a massacre — and the state watched it happen.
6/9/20267 min read


The Night the Game Became a Weapon
On February 1, 2012, 74 people were killed at a football match in Port Said, Egypt. It was not hooliganism. It was a massacre — and the state watched it happen.
Al-Ahly is not simply Egypt’s most successful football club. It is, by almost any measure, the most successful club in the history of African football — the winner of more CAF Champions Leagues than any other team, voted the African Club of the Century by the sport’s continental governing body, the institution around which the identity of millions of Egyptians is organised. When Ahly travels, Egypt travels with it. And on the night of February 1, 2012, in the canal city of Port Said, seventy-four of the people who had made that journey did not come home.
What happened at Port Said Stadium that night was reported around the world as a football riot — the worst in Egyptian history, one of the deadliest in the history of the sport. But the eyewitness accounts, the physical evidence, and the political context all point toward something more deliberate. The gates were locked. The lights were cut. The police stepped aside. The men who attacked wore civilian clothes but carried knives. And the fans who died were not random victims of crowd violence. They were members of Ultras Ahlawy — the organised supporter group that, one year earlier, had been on the front lines of the revolution that brought down Hosni Mubarak.
This is the full story of what happened, why it happened, and why the truth has never been fully established.
CONTEXT
The Ultras, the Revolution, and the Police
To understand Port Said, you need to understand what the Ultras Ahlawy were, and what they had done in the year before the massacre.
Ultras Ahlawy was founded in 2007, inspired by the hardcore supporter culture of Italian and Eastern European football. From the beginning, the group found itself in regular conflict with the Egyptian police, who viewed any large, organised, and autonomous gathering of young men as a potential threat to public order. The clashes at matches — over the right to display banners, to stand, to occupy their own section without being searched and harassed — became a training ground. The Ultras learned, through years of confrontation inside stadiums, how to hold ground against police in numbers. In Mubarak’s Egypt, they were almost unique in having done so.
When the January 25 revolution began in 2011 and protesters flooded Tahrir Square, the Ultras moved with them. Most ordinary Egyptians had no experience of standing up to the police in the street. The Ultras did. They manned barricades, organised defensive lines, and provided the organisational backbone for the revolution’s most dangerous moments. On February 2, 2011 — the day that became known as the Battle of the Camel, when Mubarak loyalists attacked the square on horseback and camel — it was the Ultras who held the barricades through the night.
Mubarak fell nine days later. The Ultras were celebrated as heroes of the revolution. They were also, as a result, the enemies of every institution that had served the old regime — and chief among those institutions was the Egyptian interior ministry and its police force, who had been humiliated at Tahrir and who had not forgotten it.
74
PEOPLE KILLED ON FEBRUARY 1, 2012
500+
INJURED IN THE STADIUM VIOLENCE
20
MINUTES THE VIOLENCE LASTED
THE MATCH
February 1, 2012
Port Said is a city on the northern mouth of the Suez Canal, 200 kilometres from Cairo. Its football club, Al-Masry — the Green Eagles — had a fierce and longstanding rivalry with Al-Ahly, rooted in the provincial city’s pride against the Cairo establishment. The match on February 1 was an Egyptian Premier League fixture, the kind played dozens of times a season across the country. There was no particular reason, on paper, for it to be different from any other.
The atmosphere from the beginning was wrong. Members of Ultras Ahlawy who travelled to Port Said that day described an immediate sense of tension — something in the crowd that felt organised rather than spontaneous. Unusually, Al-Masry fans had not been searched on entry. Witnesses reported seeing groups of men who did not look like ordinary supporters: older, dressed in dark clothing, carrying objects concealed under jackets. The stadium was already at capacity before kick-off was delayed by thirty minutes, with fans on the pitch.
Al-Masry won the match 3–1. As the final whistle sounded, thousands of home supporters surged onto the pitch — not in celebration, but in a coordinated movement directly toward the away end where the Ahlawy supporters were penned. They were armed with knives, machetes, clubs with nails hammered into them, stones, and fireworks. The police, who had been present in numbers throughout the match, did not intervene. Eyewitnesses reported seeing officers step back and allow the crowd to pour through the barriers separating the two sets of fans.
What followed lasted approximately twenty minutes. Ahlawy supporters were chased through the stands, stabbed, beaten, and thrown from the upper tiers. Some survivors described pulling the scarves off their own necks and hiding them — the scarves themselves had become targets, used as ligatures. Others smeared themselves in blood to appear already dead. The tunnel leading out of the away section was locked at both ends. Eight hundred people were trapped in an enclosed space of roughly sixty square metres, five and six deep, crushing those at the bottom. The stadium lights went out.
Seventy-four people died. Seventy-two of them were Al-Ahly supporters. The majority were between the ages of thirteen and twenty.
“The gates were locked. People were pounding on them, screaming for help. And the police — those who were supposed to protect us — sat there, doing nothing. They let it happen.”
— Survivor testimony, Port Said Stadium, February 1, 2012
THE QUESTION
Riot or Massacre?
The Egyptian authorities described what happened as a football riot — an outbreak of hooliganism that spiralled out of control. This interpretation struggled against the evidence almost immediately.
The locked gates were the most damning single fact. Many of those who died were not killed by weapons but by crushing in the locked tunnel — deaths that would not have occurred if the exits had been opened when the violence started. Police officers at the trial would be charged with welding the gates shut. The Egyptian deputy health minister called it the biggest disaster in the country’s football history. That much was undisputed. What was disputed — and remains disputed — was whether the disaster was incidental or intended.
Multiple independent accounts noted that Al-Masry fans had been allowed to enter without the standard weapons search. That the men who carried out the worst of the attacks appeared to be operating in an organised fashion. That the police’s withdrawal was not the result of being overwhelmed by numbers, but appeared to precede the surge. James Dorsey, a professor of international relations who has written extensively on Middle Eastern football politics, said plainly: too many elements — the locked gates, the lights being cut, the police withdrawal — pointed toward deliberate orchestration for coincidence to be a credible explanation.
The dominant theory among Egyptian activists, journalists, and the Ultras themselves was straightforward: this was retaliation. The interior ministry and elements of the old regime, using Al-Masry fans and what were widely described as paid thugs as proxies, had settled the score for Tahrir Square. The timing — exactly one year after the Battle of the Camel — was noted by multiple observers. Whether that interpretation was correct, no court ever fully established. The question of who ordered what, if anyone did, was never answered.
THE AFTERMATH
A Country That Fractured Further
The news reached Cairo within minutes. By that evening, thousands of people had gathered outside the interior ministry in protest, and clashes broke out across the capital. A further sixteen people died in the unrest that followed in Cairo, Alexandria, and Suez in the days after the massacre — bringing the total death toll directly connected to the events of February 1 to ninety. President Mohamed Morsi declared a state of emergency in Port Said and imposed a curfew across three canal cities.
The Egyptian Premier League was suspended immediately and did not resume for over a year. Al-Masry were banned from competition for two years. The Egyptian Football Association’s headquarters in Cairo were stormed and set on fire by Ultras supporters angry at the acquittal of police officers during the subsequent trial. Football in Egypt had, in the space of one night, become inseparable from the question of whether the revolution had meant anything at all.
Seventy-three defendants were eventually charged, including nine senior police officers and two Al-Masry club officials. The trials produced years of verdicts, appeals, retrials, and further unrest. When the first major verdict was announced in January 2013 — twenty-one defendants sentenced to death — gun battles broke out in Port Said, where residents viewed the sentences as a collective punishment of their city. At least forty people were killed in those clashes. Egypt’s Court of Cassation subsequently overturned the sentences and ordered a retrial. By 2017, the final confirmed toll was eleven death sentences upheld, with a further forty defendants receiving prison terms of between five and fifteen years. Seven police officers were acquitted. Port Said’s former security chief received five years.
The Ultras Ahlawy never accepted the outcome. Their position, stated from the beginning and never retracted, was that those who carried out the attacks had been convicted, but those who ordered them had not. The masterminds, in their language, had walked free.
LEGACY
What Port Said Did to Egyptian Football
The consequences for Egyptian football were lasting and severe. Stadiums operated under fan bans or strict capacity restrictions for years. The domestic game lost its atmosphere and, with it, much of its commercial value. Players and coaches described the experience of playing in empty or near-empty grounds as surreal and demoralising. The Egyptian national team’s performances in the years following Port Said were widely attributed in part to the disruption of the domestic league and the psychological weight the incident had placed on the game.
For the Ultras Ahlawy, Port Said was both a wound and a radicalising moment. They continued to be a force in Egyptian political life — protesting, organising, confronting the authorities — until the government of Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, which came to power in 2013, began a systematic crackdown on all organised civil society. In 2015, an Egyptian court banned all Ultras groups and their activities, ordering the seizure of their meeting places and funds. The group was formally dissolved in 2018. The young men who had stood on the barricades at Tahrir, who had been killed in Port Said, who had fought for years to hold someone accountable, were declared enemies of the state by the government that had replaced the one they helped to bring down.
Al-Ahly itself continued — as it always had, through every political upheaval Egypt has known since its founding in 1907. The club won CAF Champions League titles in 2020, 2021, and 2023. The red and white flags still fill stadiums across Africa when Ahly play. But inside the club, in the stands, in the city of Cairo, the seventy-two names from Port Said have never been forgotten. They appear in graffiti, in songs, in the four-fingered salute that became the Ultras’ symbol of remembrance — four fingers raised for the four-digit number of the dead: 74.
The gates were locked from the outside. That single fact contains everything. Someone decided those people would not get out.
FURTHER READING
Port Said Stadium riot — Wikipedia · en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Said_Stadium_riot
Scars of Egypt’s Port Said massacre refuse to fade — Middle East Eye · middleeasteye.net
For Ultras Ahlawy, Elusive Justice Five Years Later — Tahrir Institute for Middle East Policy · timep.org
James Dorsey — The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer (2016)
The Long Revolution of the Ultras Ahlawy — Roads & Kingdoms · roadsandkingdoms.com